Toros K. Panossian v. Ford Motor Company et al
Plaintiff: Toros K. Panossian
Defendant: Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 25, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2016cv07403
Filed: October 3, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Philip S Gutierrez
Referring Judge: Alexander F MacKinnon
2 Judge: John E McDermott
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 35 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; ORDER #34 by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(l)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Toros K. Panossian and Defendant Ford Motor Company stipulate to a dismissal of the above-captioned action with prejudice, each party to pay its own costs and attorney's fees. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom)
May 22, 2017 Filing 34 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company Ford Motor Company.(Attorney Katie A Richardson added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Richardson, Katie)
April 3, 2017 Filing 33 Effective April 10, 2017, Judge McDermott will be located at the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building, COURTROOM 630 on the 6th Floor, located at 255 East Temple Street, Los Angeles, California 90012. All court appearances shall be made in Courtroom 630 of the Roybal Federal Building, and all mandatory chambers copies shall be hand delivered to the judge's mailbox located outside the Clerk's Office on the 1st Floor of the Roybal Federal Building. The location for filing civil documents in paper format exempted from electronic filing and for viewing case files and other records services remains at the United States Courthouse, 312 North Spring Street, Room G-8, Los Angeles, California 90012. The location for filing criminal documents in paper format exempted from electronic filing remains at the Roybal Federal Building, 255 East Temple Street, Room 178, Los Angeles, California 90012. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rrp) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
March 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be completed no later than October 13, 2017. (ab)
March 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 31 CIVIL JURY TRIAL ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/27/2017 02:30 PM ;Jury Trial set for 12/12/2017 09:00 AM. (ab)
March 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Opening Expert Witness Disclosure: 09/12/17, Rebuttal Expert Witness Disclosure: 10/10/17, Expert Discovery Cut-off: 10/31/17, Trial Estimate: 6 Days. Amended Pleadings due by 4/13/2017. Discovery cut-off 9/5/2017. Motions due by 9/19/2017. Pretrial Conference set for 11/27/2017 02:30 PM. Jury Trial set for 12/12/2017 09:00 AM. (ab)
February 8, 2017 Filing 29 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 8-10 days, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company.. (Rodman, Daniel)
December 31, 2016 Filing 28 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed Toros K. Panossian, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were NOT executed upon the United States Attorneys Office which was NOT served. The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. The officer agency or corporation was NOT served. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons returned. PROOF OF SERVICE OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Panossian-Bassler, Natalie)
December 9, 2016 Filing 27 NOTICE TO PARTIES by District Judge Phillip S. Gutierrez. Effective December 19, 2016, Judge Gutierrez will be located at the 1st Street Courthouse, COURTROOM 6A on the 6th floor, located at 350 W. 1st Street, Los Angeles, California 90012. All Court appearances shall be made in Courtroom 6A of the 1st Street Courthouse, and all mandatory chambers copies shall be hand delivered to the judge's mail box outside the Clerk's Office on the 4th floor of the 1st Street Courthouse. The location for filing civil documents in paper format exempted from electronic filing and for viewing case files and other records services remains at the United States Courthouse, 312 North Spring Street, Room G-8, Los Angeles, California 90012. The location for filing criminal documents in paper format exempted from electronic filing remains at Edward R. Roybal Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse, 255 East Temple Street, Room 178, Los Angeles, California 90012. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rrp) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
December 1, 2016 Filing 25 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney David P Hansen counsel for Defendant Ford Motor Company. Adding David P. Hansen as counsel of record for Ford Motor Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attorney David P Hansen added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Hansen, David)
November 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS DISCHARGING OSC re: Subject Matter Jurisdiction by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: On November 4, 2016, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause ("OSC") to Plaintiff why the case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Dkt. no. 17. Plaintiff was required to respond to the OSC by November 28, 2016. Id. On November 12, 2016, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint which adequately addresses the Court's concerns. Dkt. no. 21. The OSC is hereby discharged. (bm)
November 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Scheduling Conference set for 3/13/2017 at 02:00 PM. (wm)
November 21, 2016 Filing 23 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, identifying Ford Motor Company. (Rodman, Daniel)
November 21, 2016 Filing 22 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #21 JURY DEMAND. filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company.(Rodman, Daniel)
November 12, 2016 Filing 21 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Ford Motor Company amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Toros K. Panossian(Panossian-Bassler, Natalie)
November 12, 2016 Filing 20 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Toros K. Panossian, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Ford Motor Company in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Panossian-Bassler, Natalie)
November 11, 2016 Filing 19 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Ford Motor Company answer now due 11/21/2016, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) #9 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company.(Rodman, Daniel)
November 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER TO STRIKE ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENT(S) by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: Affidavit of Service #15 , for the following reasons: Other: Need to use Clerk's Office form POS-010. Failure to comply with L.R. 5-4.5 Re: Mandatory Chambers (bm)
November 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MINUTE (In Chambers): Order to Show Cause re: Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: The Court orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing by November 28, 2016 why the Court should not dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Failure to respond as ordered may result in this case being dismissed. (shb)
November 4, 2016 Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Proof of Service #15 . The following error(s) was found: Title page is missing. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (bm)
November 1, 2016 Filing 15 DOCUMENT STRICKEN PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER DATED 11/4/16, DOCUMENT #18 . PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Toros K. Panossian, upon Defendant Ford Motor Company served on 10/7/2016, answer due 11/14/2016. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corp, Registered Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Panossian-Bassler, Natalie) Modified on 11/7/2016 (bm).
October 31, 2016 Filing 14 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant Ford Motor Company. (bm)
October 27, 2016 Filing 13 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (wm)
October 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 12 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
October 27, 2016 Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Order to Show Cause #7 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Toros K. Panossian. (Panossian-Bassler, Natalie)
October 25, 2016 Filing 10 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon to Judge Philip S. Gutierrez for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Johtn E. McDermott. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:16-cv-07403 PSG(JEMx). (rn)
October 25, 2016 Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Ford Motor Company answer now due 11/14/2016, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company.(Rodman, Daniel)
October 25, 2016 Filing 8 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attorney Daniel S Rodman added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Rodman, Daniel)
October 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 11/8/2016. (See document for details). (ib)
October 7, 2016 Filing 6 This case was assigned to Magistrate Judge MacKinnon on 10/3/16. Pursuant to the Rules of Electronic Case Opening, mandatory chambers copies of the initiating documents must be delivered immediately to the Magistrate Judge. Documents shall be delivered to Magistrate Judge MacKinnon at 312 North Spring Street, 9th Floor, Los Angeles. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ib) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
October 4, 2016 Filing 5 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plainitiff All Plaintiffs, (Panossian-Bassler, Natalie)
October 4, 2016 Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap)
October 4, 2016 Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments 1 Civil Cover Sheet should not have been attached. Each document should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action in response to this notice unless the Court so directs. (ghap)
October 4, 2016 Filing 2 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (Attachments: #1 11C Statement of Consent Proceed) (ghap)
October 3, 2016 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-18660328 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Toros K. Panossian. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Natalie A Panossian-Bassler added to party Toros K. Panossian(pty:pla))(Panossian-Bassler, Natalie)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Toros K. Panossian v. Ford Motor Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Represented By: Daniel S Rodman
Represented By: David P. Hansen
Represented By: Katie A Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 25, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Toros K. Panossian
Represented By: Natalie A. Panossian-Bassler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?