Stephen P. Wilson v. Shawn Hatton
Petitioner: Stephen P. Wilson
Respondent: Shawn Hatton
Case Number: 2:2016cv07599
Filed: October 12, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David O. Carter
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Chooljian
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 25 JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter, in favor of Shawn Hatton against Stephen P. Wilson Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 24 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition is denied, this action is dismissed with prejudice and Judgment be entered accordingly. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sbou)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stephen P. Wilson v. Shawn Hatton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Shawn Hatton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Stephen P. Wilson
Represented By: Todd L Melnik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?