Arcare v. Qiagen North American Holdings, Inc.

Plaintiff: Arcare
Defendant: Qiagen North American Holdings, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2016cv07638
Filed: October 13, 2016
Court: California Central District Court
Presiding Judge: Percy Anderson
Referring Judge: Alka Sagar
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 19, 2017 32 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson, in favor of defendant Qiagen North American Holdings, Inc. against plaintiff Arcare Related to: Order on Motion to Dismiss Case, 31 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mrgo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arcare v. Qiagen North American Holdings, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arcare
Represented By: Sara D Avila
Represented By: Gillian L Wade
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Qiagen North American Holdings, Inc.
Represented By: Joseph A Escarez
Represented By: Robert Brian Milligan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?