Bruce Rorty v. American Home Shield Corporation et al
| Bruce Rorty |
| American Home Shield Corporation, Doe 1, Does, Galkos Lico s Construction, Inc., Hired Gun Exterminating, Inc., Pacific Bell Telephone Company and Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc. |
| 2:2016cv07747 |
| October 18, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Beverly Reid O'Connell |
| Consumer Credit |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER On Stipulation of Dismissal 21 by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell: All parties stipulate to dismiss, with prejudice, of the entire case pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The parties have agreed to bear their own attorney fees and costs. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: FAILURE TO TIMELY OPPOSE MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. Plaintiffs counsel is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to why the Court should not issue sanctions against him for failing to comply with this Court 9;s Local Rules. Plaintiff's counsel's Response is due no later than Tuesday, January 2, 2017 at 4:00 p.m. An appropriate response will include reasons demonstrating good cause for Plaintiff's counsel's failure to timely oppose the Motion. RMCB may file a substantive Reply in support of the Motion by no later than Thursday, January 5, 2017 at 4:00 p.m. (rfi)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
