Bruce Rorty v. American Home Shield Corporation et al

Plaintiff: Bruce Rorty
Defendant: American Home Shield Corporation, Doe 1, Does, Galkos Lico s Construction, Inc., Hired Gun Exterminating, Inc., Pacific Bell Telephone Company and Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2016cv07747
Filed: October 18, 2016
Court: California Central District Court
Referring Judge: Jacqueline Chooljian
Presiding Judge: Beverly Reid O'Connell
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 28, 2016 16 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: FAILURE TO TIMELY OPPOSE MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. Plaintiffs counsel is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to why the Court should not issue sanctions against him for failing to comply with this Court 9;s Local Rules. Plaintiff's counsel's Response is due no later than Tuesday, January 2, 2017 at 4:00 p.m. An appropriate response will include reasons demonstrating good cause for Plaintiff's counsel's failure to timely oppose the Motion. RMCB may file a substantive Reply in support of the Motion by no later than Thursday, January 5, 2017 at 4:00 p.m. (rfi)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bruce Rorty v. American Home Shield Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Home Shield Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe 1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Galkos Lico s Construction, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hired Gun Exterminating, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pacific Bell Telephone Company
Represented By: Gleam Olivia Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc.
Represented By: Sean P Flynn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bruce Rorty
Represented By: Robert F Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?