Akeso Health Sciences, LLC v. Designs for Health, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Akeso Health Sciences, LLC v. Designs for Health, Inc.

Akeso Health Sciences, LLC v. Designs for Health, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Akeso Health Sciences, LLC
Defendant:	Designs for Health, Inc.
Case Number:	2:2016cv07749
Filed:	October 18, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	S. James Otero
Presiding Judge:	Patrick J. Walsh
Nature of Suit:	Patent

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 2, 2018	Filing 90 JUDGMENT by Judge S. James Otero: Final judgment is entered in favor of Designs for Health, Inc., and against Akeso Health Sciences, LLC, on all claims asserted by Akeso Health Sciences, LLC. All claims asserted by Plaintiff Akeso Health Sciences, LLC are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Designs for Health, Inc.s counterclaims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Designs for Health, Inc. is the prevailing party in this action. Designs for Health, Inc. may bring a motion for exceptional case determination and an award of attorneys fees under 35 U.S.C. 285 within 14 days of entry of this judgment. The Court will consider the motion in phases. The parties shall first brief the issue of Designs for Health, Inc.s entitlement to attorneys fees. Should the Court determine that an award of fees to Designs for Health Inc. is appropriate, the parties shall then submit briefing on the amount of such fees.(MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)
July 24, 2017	Filing 42 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. SEE ORDER. (im)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 2, 2018

Filing 90 JUDGMENT by Judge S. James Otero: Final judgment is entered in favor of Designs for Health, Inc., and against Akeso Health Sciences, LLC, on all claims asserted by Akeso Health Sciences, LLC. All claims asserted by Plaintiff Akeso Health Sciences, LLC are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Designs for Health, Inc.s counterclaims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Designs for Health, Inc. is the prevailing party in this action. Designs for Health, Inc. may bring a motion for exceptional case determination and an award of attorneys fees under 35 U.S.C. 285 within 14 days of entry of this judgment. The Court will consider the motion in phases. The parties shall first brief the issue of Designs for Health, Inc.s entitlement to attorneys fees. Should the Court determine that an award of fees to Designs for Health Inc. is appropriate, the parties shall then submit briefing on the amount of such fees.(MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)

July 24, 2017

Filing 42 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. SEE ORDER. (im)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Akeso Health Sciences, LLC v. Designs for Health, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Akeso Health Sciences, LLC
Represented By:	Shawn G Hansen
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Designs for Health, Inc.
Represented By:	Douglas G Muehlhauser
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?