In re Mary A. Flowers
| Mary A. Flowers |
| Mary A. Flowers |
| Schorr Law, A Professional Corporation |
| 2:2016cv08014 |
| October 27, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Manuel L. Real |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER OF DISMISSAL BY LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Manuel L. Real. WHEREAS Appellant was ordered to show cause in writing by not later than March 14, 2017, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution for Appellant's failure to timely file her opening briefs 21 ; WHEREAS the period elapsed without any opening briefs filed by the Appellant or any good cause to warrant an extension; The Court hereby DISMISSES the instant case for lack of prosecution. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Manuel L. Real. On February 3, 2017, a Certificate of Readiness and Completion of Record was issued setting the opening brief to be filed and served by March 6, 2017. To date Appe llant has failed to comply. Accordingly, Appellant is hereby ordered to show cause in writing by not later than March 14, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The court will consider the filing of the following as a n appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause, on or before the above date: ! Apellants opening brief to be filed and served. In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the court's Order will result in the dismissal of the action. (clee)
|
|
Filing
6
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: BANKRUPTCY APPEAL by Judge Manuel L. Real. Appellant is hereby ordered to show cause in writing, on or before December 14, 2016 why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Failure to respond will result in a dismissal of this case. If the required action has been taken, no further response to the order to show cause is necessary. (iv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
