Bryant Joseph Filer v. C. E. Ducart
Petitioner: Bryant Joseph Filer
Respondent: C. E. Ducart
Case Number: 2:2016cv08041
Filed: October 28, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David T. Bristow
Presiding Judge: Dale S. Fischer
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 7 JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer related to: Order, 6 . IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (iva)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bryant Joseph Filer v. C. E. Ducart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: C. E. Ducart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Bryant Joseph Filer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?