EFG Bank AG, Cayman Branch v. Transamerica Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff: EFG Bank AG, Cayman Branch
Defendant: Transamerica Life Insurance Company
Case Number: 2:2016cv08104
Filed: October 31, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dale S. Fischer
Presiding Judge: Gail J. Standish
Nature of Suit: Insurance

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 203 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Christina A. Snyder: RE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS SIXTH AMENDED COMPLAINT 189 . The Court GRANTS Transamerica's partialmotion to dismiss and DISMISSES plaintiffs' third claim for tortious breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing with prejudice. (lc)
February 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 181 MINUTES OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FIFTH AMENDED COMPLAINT (Dkt. 166 , filed January 2, 2020) Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder. The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Transamerica's motion to dismiss plaint iffs' breach of contract claim, as alleged in 86(b) of the FAC. With respect to plaintiffs' policies that include "interest" as an enumerated cost factor, the Court DISMISSES plaintiffs' breach of contract claim, as alleged in 86(b) of the FAC, with prejudice. With respect to plaintiffs' policies that do not include "interest" as an enumerated cost factor, the Court DENIES Transamerica's motion to dismiss. The Court DENIES Transamerica's moti on to dismiss plaintiffs' conversion claim. The Court DISMISSES plaintiffs' claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing sounding in tort without prejudice. Plaintiffs shall file a sixth amended complaint within fourteen (14) days. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (lom)
November 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 146 MINUTES OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER AND FOR LEAVE TO FILE FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT (Dkt 132 , filed September 27, 2019) held before Judge Christina A. Snyder: For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS plaintiffs' m otion to modify the scheduling order and for leave to file a fourth amended complaint. Plaintiff shall file a fourth amended complaint within three (3) days. Transamerica shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of plaintiffs' filing the fourth amended complaint to respond. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (bm)
April 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 85 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. 71 (ch)
July 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 43 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Defendant's Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of Iowa 33 is DENIED. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: EFG Bank AG, Cayman Branch v. Transamerica Life Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EFG Bank AG, Cayman Branch
Represented By: Khai LeQuang
Represented By: Abigail W Lloyd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Transamerica Life Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?