Ana Ilagan v. Epifania Nicolas DDS Inc et al
Ana Ilagan |
Epifania Nicolas DDS Inc and Epifania Nicolas |
2:2016cv08119 |
November 1, 2016 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Michael R. Wilner |
Otis D. Wright |
False Claims Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 61 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REOPEN CASE AND ENFORCE SETTLEMENT 59 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiffs motion to re-open the case is GRANTED.Plaintiff is ORDERED to submit a copy of the final settlement agreement, accompanied by a Motio n to Enforce Settlement no later than February 18, 2019. In the event Plaintiff cannot produce the final settlement order, signed by both parties, the Court will issue a revised scheduling order and the matter will proceed to trial. (MD-JS5 Case Reopened) (lc) Modified on 2/11/2019 (lc). |
Filing 33 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER VACATING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE; OSC RE: SANCTIONS by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. The October 4 conference is VACATED. By noon on Thursday, October 5, Mr. Natividad and Mr. Feild will each file a declaration with the Court (not to exceed five pages) explaining his failure to comply with the Courts order. (See Minuet Order for further details) re: Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, 28 (vm) |
Filing 32 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (See Order for details) re Stipulation for Protective Order 31 (vm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.