United States of America v. JPMorgan Chase N.A., et al
| The United States of America |
| JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., WMI Liquidating Trust and WMI Rainier, LLC |
| 2:2016cv08127 |
| November 1, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dean D. Pregerson |
| Andrew J. Wistrich |
| Environmental Matters |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
CONSENT DECREE by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: This Consent Decree shall constitute the Final Judgment between and among the United States and Settling Defendants. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., on behalf of itself and all other Settling Defendants, will pay $85,000,000.00 to The California Department of Toxic Substances Control to be used for work at the Site. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., on behalf of Settling Defendants,shall pay to EPA the principal amount of $1,000,000.00. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR OTHER SPECIFICS, DETAILED INSTRUCTIONS AND DEADLINES THEREIN.) (lc)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. The Court having read and considered the United States' Unopposed Motion to Enter Consent Decree, and Memorandum in Support Thereof that was filed on December 23, 2016, and for good cause shown:(1) The United S tates' Unopposed Motion to Enter Consent Decree is hereby GRANTED. (2) The Consent Decree that was lodged with the Court on November 1,2016 (Docket No. [3-1]), is hereby ENTERED as a final judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (jy)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
