Douglas Simmons v. Los Angeles Unified School District Sedgwick CMS

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Douglas Simmons v. Los Angeles Unified School District Sedgwick CMS

Douglas Simmons v. Los Angeles Unified School District Sedgwick CMS

Plaintiff:	Douglas Simmons
Defendant:	Los Angeles Unified School District Sedgwick CMS
Case Number:	2:2016cv08269
Filed:	November 7, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Dolly M. Gee
Presiding Judge:	Rozella A. Oliver
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 17, 2017	Filing 17 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant withi n 90 days after the complaint is filed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Generally, defendant must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). In the present case, it appears that these time periods h ave not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before May 1, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed as to defendant Sedgwick for lack of prosecution. No oral argument of this ma tter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a written response on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed as to defendant Sedgwick if a written response demonstrating good cause is not filed by the date indicated above. (clee)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 17, 2017

Filing 17 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant withi n 90 days after the complaint is filed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Generally, defendant must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). In the present case, it appears that these time periods h ave not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before May 1, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed as to defendant Sedgwick for lack of prosecution. No oral argument of this ma tter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a written response on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed as to defendant Sedgwick if a written response demonstrating good cause is not filed by the date indicated above. (clee)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Douglas Simmons v. Los Angeles Unified School District Sedgwick CMS
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Los Angeles Unified School District Sedgwick CMS
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Douglas Simmons
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?