Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Bambi Gicana et al
Plaintiff: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant: Bambi Gicana and Araceli Maloney
Case Number: 2:2016cv08317
Filed: November 8, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Ronald S.W. Lew
Presiding Judge: Rozella A. Oliver
Nature of Suit: Insurance

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 183 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 181 . The Court hereby accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the Application for an Order to Show Cause as to Why a Receiver Should Not Be Appointed Pending Judgment Debtor's Appeals is DENIED. (dml)
July 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 115 Order re: Objection and Opposition to Application to the Clerk to Tax Costs 113 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. Based on the foregoing, the Court OVERRULES Maloney's Objection. The Clerk shall tax Gicana's costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. (lom)
June 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 112 ORDER by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: GRANTING 108 EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS FEES. The Court GRANTS GicanasApplication. The deadline for both parties to file motions for attorneys fees is July 13, 2018. (shb)
June 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 104 JUDGMENT by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. On June 1, 2018, this Court enteredjudgment in favor of Gicana on the equitable remedies for the 401(k) benefits. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Gicana and against Maloney, in accordance with this Courts previous Orderre: Gicanas Motion for Summary Judgment and Order re: Bench Trial. The entire balance of funds in this Courts registry, less any fees payable to the Clerk ofCourt, shall be distributed to the Supe rior Court of California, payable to the Clerk of Court, Case No. 16STPB03539, Stanley Mosk Courthouse, 111 North HillStreet, Los Angeles, CA 90012, in which Decedents trust is being litigated. Further, Decedents trust holds an equitable lien up to & #036;460,509.25 on Maloneysindividual retirement account at Securities America. Maloney owes the trust an accounting of her transactions involving the 401(k) monies and restitution. Gicana shall recover her costs in this Action. Related to: Order, 103 (shb)
April 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER re: Maloney's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as to "Cross-Claims" of Bambi Gicana 54 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. Based on the foregoing, the Court DENIES Maloney's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 54 . IT IS SO ORDERED. (lom)
February 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER Striking Maloney's Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment 59 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. Because Maloney ignored the deadline, the Motion is STRICKEN. The Court will only consider Maloney's Opposition to Gicana's Motion for Summary Judgment ("Opposition") 59 . Maloney shall not file any further documentation regarding her Opposition or stricken Motion. (jre)
April 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 32 PLAINTIFF-IN-INTERPLEADER METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYS DISCHARGE AND DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; PERMANENT INJUNCTION; AND RECOVERY OF REASONABLEATTORNEYS FEES filed by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: That Metropoli tan Life Insurance Company (MetLife) is dischargedof any and all liability with respect to the Plan Benefits and the underlying group policy and any and all claims that Defendants-in-Interpleader Gicana and Maloney may have regarding the Plan Benefit s and the underlying group policy; That Defendants-In-Interpleader Gicana and Maloney and their respective agents, attorneys and/or assigns are enjoined and perpetually restrained from instituting any suit at law or equity, or action of any kind what soever, againstMetLife and/or its parent companies, subsidiary companies, agents, affiliates,representatives or attorneys with respect to the Plan Benefits and the underlying group policy; That MetLife will recover its attorneys fees and costs from the stake on deposit in the amount of $4,068.7. Said funds are to be payable to Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. That MetLife is dismissed from this action entirely with prejudice. (shb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Bambi Gicana et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bambi Gicana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Araceli Maloney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Represented By: Matthew William Dietz
Represented By: Misty A Murray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?