James Mitchell Hart et al v. Premier Apartments, LLC et al
| James Mitchell Hart and Roxsana Hart |
| Does, Randy Ledis and Premier Apartments, LLC |
| 2:2016cv08395 |
| November 10, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F. Eick |
| Fernando M. Olguin |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
JUDGMENT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that: 1. The Petition to Approve Compromise of a Disputed Claim (Document No. 41 ), as amended by the Amendment to Petition for Order for Approval of Compromise (Document No. 43 ), is gr anted as set forth herein. The proposed order submitted with the Amendment to Petition for Order for Approval of Compromise (Document No. 43 -1) will be issued by the court. 2. The court hereby grants final approval to the parties' Settlement Agreement (Settlement Agreement) (Document No. 45 -1). The court finds that the settlement is fair and reasonable and serves the best interests of Mr. Hart. The parties are ordered to perform their obligations pursuant to the terms of the Settle ment Agreement and this Order. 3. Plaintiffs Ex Parte Application to Waive Bond Requirement Under Local Rule 17-1.7(Document No. 42 ) is granted. The bond requirement in Local Rule 17-1.7 is hereby waived. 4. Plaintiff James Mitchell Hart shall be paid $273,564.10, to be deposited into a blocked account. The court will issue the proposed orders (Document Nos. 43 -1 & ]44]-1) submitted by the parties. Withdrawals of the principal or interest may be made from the blocked account by con servator Roxsana Hart, as ordered by the state court. 5. Plaintiff Roxsana Hart shall be paid $273,564.10, in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement. 6. Plaintiff's counsel shall be paid $333,333.33 in attorney's f ees and $21,553.46 in costs in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement. 7. This action is dismissed with prejudice, with all parties to bear their own fees and costs except as set forth herein. (lom) (Main Document 48 replaced on 11/27/2017) (lom).
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 45 days from the filing date of this Order, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
|
Filing
35
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 7/28/2017. (vdr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
