Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation v. Matthew Saundry et al
| Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation |
| Does and Matthew Saundry |
| 2:2016cv08463 |
| November 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Ronald S.W. Lew |
| Michael R. Wilner |
| Copyright |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT MATTHEW SAUNDRY by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew, in the principal amount of $240,000, interest in the amount of $0.00, attorneys fees of $8,400.00, costs of $0.00 for a total judgment of $248,400.00. Defendant, his agents, servants, employees and all persons in active concert and participation with him who receive actual notice of the injunction are permanently enjoined from: SEE JUDGMENT. Related to MOTION AT 18 . The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter for the purpose of enforcing the provisions of this Judgment and Order and to enforce its mandatory injunction. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (jre)
|
|
Filing
17
IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflectedbelow. Accordingly, the Court , on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writing no later than May 5, 2017, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: PLAINTIFF'S FILING OF A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a response or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. Failure to timely respond to this order may result in sanctions and/or the dismissal of this action. Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this order upon all defendants who have been served with the Summons and Complaint but have yet to appear in this action. Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action. (jre)
|
|
Filing
13
IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Co urt, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff/s to show cause in writing no later than March 15, 2017, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: Defendant/s' Answer/Response to the Complaint/Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Default on defendant/s OR appropri ate request for dismissal of this action. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plai ntiff/s is due. Plaintiff is to serve notice of this Order on all named parties in this action who have been served but have not yet appeared. Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions including the dismissal of this action. (jre)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
