Timothy Sean McNally v. Attorney General of the State of California

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Timothy Sean McNally v. Attorney General of the State of California

Timothy Sean McNally v. Attorney General of the State of California

Petitioner:	Timothy Sean McNally
Respondent:	Attorney General of the State of California
Case Number:	2:2016cv08572
Filed:	November 17, 2016
Court:	U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Cormac J. Carney
Presiding Judge:	Karen L. Stevenson
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 2, 2020	Filing 65 JUDGMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney, Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 64 . IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr)
August 17, 2018	Filing 42 ORDER ACCEPTING INTERIM FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Cormac J. Carney for MOTION to Dismiss PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 24 , Report and Recommendation (Issued) 37 . IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Respondent's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; (2) Ground Seven in the Petition is dismissed with prejudice; and (3) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without prejudice unless, within thirty days of the service of this Order, Petitioner files a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal as to the unexhausted claims in Grounds Eleven, Twelve, Fourteen, Fifteen, and Sixteen and proceeds solely on the exhausted claims in Grounds One to Six, Eight, Nine, Ten, and Thirteen. (hr)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 2, 2020

Filing 65 JUDGMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney, Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 64 . IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr)

August 17, 2018

Filing 42 ORDER ACCEPTING INTERIM FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Cormac J. Carney for MOTION to Dismiss PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 24 , Report and Recommendation (Issued) 37 . IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Respondent's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; (2) Ground Seven in the Petition is dismissed with prejudice; and (3) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without prejudice unless, within thirty days of the service of this Order, Petitioner files a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal as to the unexhausted claims in Grounds Eleven, Twelve, Fourteen, Fifteen, and Sixteen and proceeds solely on the exhausted claims in Grounds One to Six, Eight, Nine, Ten, and Thirteen. (hr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Timothy Sean McNally v. Attorney General of the State of California
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of California
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Timothy Sean McNally
Represented By:	Emry J Allen
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?