Narinder S. Grewal et al v. NSM Securities, Inc. et al
Narinder S. Grewal, Pritpal Grewal, Narinder S. Grewal, M.D. Defined Benefits Pension Plan, Shannon Grewal and Yuvraj Grewal |
NSM Securities, Inc, NSM Securities, Inc., Niyukt Raghu Bhasin and Naveen Bhagwani |
2:2016cv08695 |
November 22, 2016 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
John A Kronstadt |
Other Statutes: Arbitration |
09 U.S.C. § 0009 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 53 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING CASE (DKT. #52 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Plaintiff filed a Notice, which requests the dismissal of Bhagwani pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 (a). Dkt. 52. That request is granted, and Bhagwani is DISMISSED, without prejudice. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (ah) |
Filing 52 NOTICE filed by Plaintiffs Narinder S. Grewal, Pritpal Grewal, Shannon Grewal, Yuvraj Grewal, Narinder S. Grewal, M.D. Defined Benefits Pension Plan. (England, Austin) |
Filing 51 ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTED SERVICE AGAINST DEFENDANT NAVEEN BHAGWANI (DKT. #50 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: It is hereby ordered that service of summons in this action be made on Defendant Naveen Bhagwani by publication of service in the Miami Herald. It is further ordered that a proof of service with respect to the publication in the Miami Herald shall be filed with this Court no later than September 26, 2017. (ah) |
Filing 50 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Service by Publication filed by Plaintiffs Narinder S. Grewal, Pritpal Grewal, Shannon Grewal, Yuvraj Grewal, Narinder S. Grewal, M.D. Defined Benefits Pension Plan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Affidavit of Austin H. England, #2 Proposed Order) (England, Austin) |
Filing 49 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE DEFENDANT NAVEEN BHAGWANI (DKT. #42 #48 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: On or before July 28, 2017, Plaintiff shall either submit a request to serve Defendant Bhagwani by publication pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e) or file a dismissal. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ake) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 48 NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Judge John A. Kronstadt. (SEE ORDER FOR SPECIFICS) (bp) |
Filing 47 JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. JUDGMENT is rendered against Defendants Niyukt Bhasin ("Bhasin") and NSM Securities, Inc., ("NSM") as follows: The Arbitration Award rendered against Bhasin and NSM, jointly and severally, on November 23, 2015, by a FINRA Dispute Resolution Panel, in Arbitration No. 12-02861, is COMFIRMED; and, Judgment is entered against Bhasin and, jointly and severally, in the amount of $1,889.261.48, plus ten percent (105) interest from September 11, 2015, until paid., Niyukt Raghu Bhasin and NSM Securities, Inc. terminated. (bp) |
Filing 46 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Narinder S. Grewal, M.D. Defined Benefits Pension Plan, Pritpal Grewal, Narinder S. Grewal, Shannon Grewal, Yuvraj Grewal, upon Defendant Naveen Bhagwani served on 5/19/2017, answer due 6/9/2017. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Naveen Bhagwani in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (England, Austin) |
Filing 45 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Order on Motion for Default Judgment,, #43 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (Proposed Judgment))(England, Austin) |
Filing 44 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER SETTING DATE FOR PROOF OF SERVICE RE DEFENDANT NAVEEN BHAGWANI (DKT. #42 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's May 18, 2017 Status Report (the "Report"), which indicates Plaintiff's intention to pursue the claims against Defendant Bhagwani. The Report states that the summons and Complaint were to be served on Bhagwani on May 19, 2017. Dkt. #42 at 2. Accordingly, the Court directs Plaintiff to file a proof of service using the Court's POS-010 form no later than June 19, 2017, or within five days of completing service, whichever is to occur first. A failure to serve or file the proof of service will result in the dismissal of the Defendant. #42 THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ake) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 43 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT RE DEFENDANTS NSM SECURITIES, INC. AND NIYUKT BHASIN (DKT. #34 ); ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT NAVEEN BHAGWANI SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION (DKT. 14 , 23 , 30 , 32 , 38 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Motion is GRANTED. On or before May 26, 2017, Plaintiffs shall lodge a proposed judgment consistent with this Order. Any objections by Bhasin or NSM shall be filed by June 2, 2017 in accordance with the Local Rules. This determination is without prejudice to a request to amend the judgment to add Bhagwani if he is served, and does not respond, or if he responds, but the Petition is granted. (ah) |
Filing 42 NOTICE filed by Plaintiffs Narinder S. Grewal, Pritpal Grewal, Shannon Grewal, Yuvraj Grewal, Narinder S. Grewal, M.D. Defined Benefits Pension Plan. Status Report, May 18, 2017 (England, Austin) |
Filing 41 MINUTES OF MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT RE DEFENDANTS NSM SECURITIES, INC. AND NIYUKT BHASIN (DKT. #34 ); ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT NAVEEN BHAGWANI SHOULD NOT BE BISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION (DKTS. 14 , 23 , 30 , 32 , 38 ) held before Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court directs Plaintiff to serve Bhagwani by publication or by posting the summons and Complaint on the door of the address that has been identified for him. On or before May 18, 2017, Plaintiff shall file a joint report regarding whether he intends to serve Bhagwani in one of these two manners or file a dismissal. The Court takes the Motion UNDER SUBMISSION and a ruling will be issued. Court Reporter: Alex Joko. (ah) |
Filing 40 OPPOSITION RESPONSE TO (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER SETTING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE HEARING AS TO WHY DEFENDANT NAVEEN BHAGWANI SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED (Doc. 38) filed by Plaintiffs Narinder S. Grewal, Pritpal Grewal, Shannon Grewal, Yuvraj Grewal, Narinder S. Grewal, M.D. Defined Benefits Pension Plan. (England, Austin) |
Filing 39 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge John A. Kronstadt: granting #37 Non-Resident Attorney Austin H. England APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs, Narinder S. Grewal, M.D., Pritpal Grewal, Narinder S. Grewal, M.D. Defined Benefit Pension Plan, Shannon Grewal and Yuvraj Grewal, designating Robert A. Crook as local counsel. (bp) |
Filing 38 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER SETTING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE HEARING AS TO WHY DEFENDANT NAVEEN BHAGWANI SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's Response to the Order to Show Cause. Dkt. #36 . Plaintiff has had approximately five months to serve Defendants. Plaintiff shall file an updated report no later than May 10, 2016, regarding any additional efforts to serve Defendant Bhagwani. The Court sets a hearing on the Order to Show Cause for May 15, 2017 at 8:30 a.m., at which time it will determine whether to dismiss Bhagwani or permit additional time for Plaintiff to serve Defendant. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ake) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 37 First APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Austin Hinds England to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs Narinder S. Grewal, Pritpal Grewal, Shannon Grewal, Yuvraj Grewal, Narinder S. Grewal, M.D. Defined Benefits Pension Plan (Pro Hac Vice Fee - Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-19780845) filed by plaintiff Narinder S. Grewal, Pritpal Grewal, Shannon Grewal, Yuvraj Grewal, Narinder S. Grewal, M.D. Defined Benefits Pension Plan. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Robert A Croo k added to party Narinder S. Grewal(pty:pla), Attorney Robert A Crook added to party Pritpal Grewal(pty:pla), Attorney Robert A Crook added to party Shannon Grewal(pty:pla), Attorney Robert A Crook added to party Yuvraj Grewal(pty:pla), Attorney Robert A Crook added to party Narinder S. Grewal, M.D. Defined Benefits Pension Plan(pty:pla)) (Crook, Robert) |
Filing 36 OPPOSITION RESPONSE TO (IN CHAMBERS) Continuing ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION regarding Defendant Naveen Bhagwani (DKT. 30) filed by Plaintiffs Narinder S. Grewal, Pritpal Grewal, Shannon Grewal, Yuvraj Grewal, Narinder S. Grewal, M.D. Defined Benefits Pension Plan. (Vitullo, Anthony) |
Filing 35 NOTICE of Motion for Default Judgment against Defendants Niyukt Bhasin and NSM Securities, Inc. and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiffs Narinder S. Grewal, Pritpal Grewal, Shannon Grewal, Yuvraj Grewal, Narinder S. Grewal, M.D. Defined Benefits Pension Plan. (Vitullo, Anthony) |
Filing 34 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Default Judgment against Defendants Niyukt Bhasin and NSM Securities, Inc. filed by Plaintiffs Narinder S. Grewal, Pritpal Grewal, Shannon Grewal, Yuvraj Grewal, Narinder S. Grewal, M.D. Defined Benefits Pension Plan. Motion set for hearing on 5/15/2017 at 08:30 AM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit A-1, #3 Exhibit A-2, #4 Exhibit A-3, #5 Proposed Order) (Vitullo, Anthony) |
Filing 32 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION RE DEFENDANT NAVEEN BHAGWANI (DKT. 30 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's Response to the Order to Show Cause (the "Response"). Dkt. #31 . The Response requests that the summons be issued and an additional 30 day extension be granted in order to serve Defendant Bhagwani. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's request. The Clerk is directed to issue the summons and Plaintiff is given until May 3, 2017 to serve Defendant and file a proof of service. In light of the foregoing, the Order to Show Cause is continued to May 3, 2017. If a proof of service is not filed timely, the Court will determine whether to dismiss Defendant for lack of prosecution. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ake) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 33 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Naveen Bhagwani. (bp) |
Filing 31 RESPONSE TO (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION REGARDING DEFENDANT NAVEEN BHAGWANI 30 filed by Plaintiffs Narinder S. Grewal, Pritpal Grewal, Shannon Grewal, Yuvraj Grewal, Narinder S. Grewal, M.D. Defined Benefits Pension Plan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Letter/Memorandum, #2 Exhibit B - Affidavit)(Vitullo, Anthony) Modified on 4/4/2017 (bp). |
Filing 30 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION RE DEFENDANT NAVEEN BHAGWANI by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than March 31, 2017, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. In the absence of showing good cause, an action shall be dismissed if the summons and complaint have not been served within 90 days after the filing of the complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). An action may be dismissed prior to such time if the Plaintiff fails diligently to prosecute the action. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of an appropriate response. No oral argument will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Plaintiff is advised that the Court will consider the filing of a responsive pleading to the complaint and/or proof(s) of service, which indicates proper service in full compliance with the federal rules, on or before the date upon which the response is due, as a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause. #17 THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ake) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 29 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER SETTING HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT RE DEFENDANTS NIYUKT RAGHU BASHIN AND NSM SECURITIES, INC. by Judge John A. Kronstadt: On March 21, 2017, default was entered against Defendants. Dkt. #28 . The Court sets the hearing on the motion for default judgment for May 15, 2017 at 8:30 a.m., which shall be served on Defendants and filed with the Court no later than April 10, 2017.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ake) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 28 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Niyukt Raghu Bashin, NSM Securities, Inc. (bp) |
Filing 27 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Narinder S. Grewal, Pritpal Grewal, Shannon Grewal, Yuvraj Grewal, Narinder S. Grewal, M.D. Defined Benefits Pension Plan. (Vitullo, Anthony) |
Filing 26 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant NSM Securities, Inc. filed by Plaintiffs Narinder S. Grewal, M.D. Defined Benefits Pension Plan, Pritpal Grewal, Narinder S. Grewal, Shannon Grewal, Yuvraj Grewal. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Requirements, #2 Affidavit Military, #3 Proposed Order) (Vitullo, Anthony) |
Filing 25 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Niyukt Raghu Bhasin filed by Plaintiffs Narinder S. Grewal, M.D. Defined Benefits Pension Plan, Pritpal Grewal, Narinder S. Grewal, Shannon Grewal, Yuvraj Grewal. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Requirements, #2 Affidavit Military, #3 Proposed Order) (Vitullo, Anthony) |
Filing 24 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Niyukt Raghu Bhasin filed by Plaintiffs Narinder S. Grewal, M.D. Defined Benefits Pension Plan, Pritpal Grewal, Narinder S. Grewal, Shannon Grewal, Yuvraj Grewal. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Requirments, #2 Affidavit Military, #3 Proposed Order) (Vitullo, Anthony) |
Filing 23 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court received the response to the Order to Show Cause (the "OSC") and the Proofs of Service. Dkt. #18 , #20 , #21 . Based on the Proofs of Service, an answer was to have been filed. Accordingly, the Court continues the OSC to March 20, 2017 to permit Plaintiff the opportunity to file an application requesting the entry of default pursuant to Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff is advised that the Court will consider the filing of an application, which complies with the federal rules, on or before the date upon which the response is due, as a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of an appropriate response. No oral argument will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Failure to respond will result in the dismissal of this matter. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ake) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 22 Summons Returned Unexecuted filed by Plaintiff Narinder S. Grewal, M.D. Defined Benefits Pension Plan, Pritpal Grewal, Narinder S. Grewal, Shannon Grewal, Yuvraj Grewal. as to Naveen Bhagwani. (Vitullo, Anthony) |
Filing 21 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Narinder S. Grewal, M.D. Defined Benefits Pension Plan, Pritpal Grewal, Narinder S. Grewal, Shannon Grewal, Yuvraj Grewal, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Manisha Sharma, wife of Niykt Bhasin, registered agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. Service on Defendant NSM (Vitullo, Anthony) |
Filing 20 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Narinder S. Grewal, M.D. Defined Benefits Pension Plan, Pritpal Grewal, Narinder S. Grewal, Shannon Grewal, Yuvraj Grewal, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Manisha Sharma, wife in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. Service on Defendant Bhasin (Vitullo, Anthony) |
Filing 19 ORDER by Judge John A. Kronstadt: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #15 , Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #16 , Summons Returned Unexecuted #17 , for the following reasons: Title page is missing. On or before March 13, 2017, counsel shall refile the documents with a title/caption page pursuant to L.R. 11-3.8; (pso) |
Filing 18 OPPOSITION RESPONSE TO (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION filed by Plaintiffs Narinder S. Grewal, Pritpal Grewal, Shannon Grewal, Yuvraj Grewal, Narinder S. Grewal, M.D. Defined Benefits Pension Plan. (Vitullo, Anthony) |
Filing 17 ***STRICKEN PER DKT. #19 *** Summons Returned Unexecuted filed by Plaintiff Narinder S. Grewal, M.D. Defined Benefits Pension Plan, Pritpal Grewal, Narinder S. Grewal, Shannon Grewal, Yuvraj Grewal. as to Naveen Bhagwani. (Vitullo, Anthony) Modified on 3/10/2017 (pso). |
Filing 16 ***STRICKEN PER DKT. #19 *** PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Narinder S. Grewal, M.D. Defined Benefits Pension Plan, Pritpal Grewal, Narinder S. Grewal, Shannon Grewal, Yuvraj Grewal, upon Defendant NSM Securities, Inc. served on 12/12/2016, answer due 1/3/2017. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Manisha Sharma, wife of Niykt Bhasin, registered agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Vitullo, Anthony) Modified on 3/10/2017 (pso). |
Filing 15 ***STRICKEN PER DKT. #19 ***PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Narinder S. Grewal, M.D. Defined Benefits Pension Plan, Pritpal Grewal, Narinder S. Grewal, Shannon Grewal, Yuvraj Grewal, upon Defendant Niyukt Raghu Bhasin served on 12/12/2016, answer due 1/3/2017. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Manisha Sharma, wife in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Vitullo, Anthony) Modified on 3/10/2017 (pso). |
Filing 14 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than March 9, 2017, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. In the absence of showing good cause, an action shall be dismissed if the summons and complaint have not been served within 90 days after the filing of the complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). An action may be dismissed prior to such time if the Plaintiff fails diligently to prosecute the action. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of an appropriate response. No oral argument will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Plaintiff is advised that the Court will consider the filing of a responsive pleading to the complaint and/or proof(s) of service, which indicates proper service in full compliance with the federal rules, on or before the date upon which the response is due, as a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ake) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 13 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER NOTIFYING PARTIES OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS FOR COURT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Effective December 19, 2016, Judge Kronstadt will relocate to the 1st Street Courthouse. His new address is 350 W. 1st Street, Courtroom 10B, Los Angeles, California 90012. All mandatory chambers copies shall be hand delivered to the mailbox for this Court outside the Clerk's Office, which is located on the 4th floor of the 1st Street Courthouse. The location for filing civil documents in paper format exempted from electronic filing and for viewing case files and other records services remains at the United States Courthouse, 312 North Spring Street, Room G-8, Los Angeles, California 90012. The location for filing criminal documents in paper format exempted from electronic filing remains at Edward R. Roybal Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse, 255 East Temple Street, Room 178, Los Angeles, California 90012. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rrp) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 12 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. (ah) |
Filing 11 NOTICE filed by Plaintiff Narinder S. Grewal, Pritpal Grewal, Shannon Grewal, Yuvraj Grewal. and Narinder S. Grewal, M.D. Defined Benefit Pension Plan's Certification and Notice of Interested Parties (Vitullo, Anthony) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. Other error(s) with document(s): Attachment 6 Civil Cover Sheet should have been e-filed separately and in the correct event category located under Civil Events Other Filings Miscellaneous Filings. No further action is required unless the Court so directs. (car) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant NSM Securities, Inc. (car) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Niyukt Raghu Bhasin. (car) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Naveen Bhagwani. (car) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (car) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff Narinder S. Grewal. (Vitullo, Anthony) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff Narinder S. Grewal. (Vitullo, Anthony) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff's attorney Pritpal Grewal. (Vitullo, Anthony) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-18934389 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff's attorney Narinder S. Grewal. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Anthony Leonard Vitullo added to party Narinder S. Grewal(pty:mov))(Vitullo, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.