Terry L. Newman v. Martin Biter

Terry L. Newman v. Martin Biter

Petitioner:	Terry L Newman
Respondent:	Martin Biter
Case Number:	2:2016cv08699
Filed:	November 22, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Andrew J. Guilford
Presiding Judge:	Rozella A. Oliver
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 12, 2016	Filing 7 (In Chambers) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS SUCCESSIVE by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. On November 22, 2016, the Court received Petitioner Terry L. Newman's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Pers on in State Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (the "2016 Petition"). The 2016 Petition challenges Petitioner's 2005 sentence in the Los Angeles County Superior Court in case number BA258596. On November 23, 2016, the Court issued an order requiring a response to the 2016 Petition. The 2016 Petition appears to be successive and is barred pursuant to § 2244(a) (3)(A). Petitioner is ordered to show cause by January 3, 2017, why the 2016 Petition should not be dismissed as successive. Petitioner is warned that failure to respond by January 3, 2017, will result in the instant 2016 Petition being summarily dismissed as successive. {SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (gr)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 12, 2016

Filing 7 (In Chambers) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS SUCCESSIVE by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. On November 22, 2016, the Court received Petitioner Terry L. Newman's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Pers on in State Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (the "2016 Petition"). The 2016 Petition challenges Petitioner's 2005 sentence in the Los Angeles County Superior Court in case number BA258596. On November 23, 2016, the Court issued an order requiring a response to the 2016 Petition. The 2016 Petition appears to be successive and is barred pursuant to § 2244(a) (3)(A). Petitioner is ordered to show cause by January 3, 2017, why the 2016 Petition should not be dismissed as successive. Petitioner is warned that failure to respond by January 3, 2017, will result in the instant 2016 Petition being summarily dismissed as successive. {SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (gr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Terry L. Newman v. Martin Biter
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Martin Biter
Represented By:	Taylor T Nguyen
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Terry L Newman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?