Roger M Keller v. S. Hatton
Petitioner: Roger M Keller
Respondent: S. Hatton
Case Number: 2:2016cv08709
Filed: November 22, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Cormac J. Carney
Presiding Judge: Rozella A. Oliver
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 18 JUDGMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney, Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 17 , Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 . Pursuant to the Courts Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied, and this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roger M Keller v. S. Hatton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: S. Hatton
Represented By: Lise S Jacobson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Roger M Keller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?