Robert Miranda Gomez v. J. Gastelo

Robert Miranda Gomez v. J. Gastelo

Petitioner:	Robert Miranda Gomez
Respondent:	J. Gastelo
Case Number:	2:2016cv08739
Filed:	November 22, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Douglas F. McCormick
Presiding Judge:	James V. Selna
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 29, 2017	Filing 21 JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna: Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge 20 , IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mt)
April 5, 2017	Filing 12 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REQUIRING FURTHER BRIEFING by Magistrate Judge John D. Early. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS further briefing regarding whether the Court has jurisdiction to entertain this Petition. Petitioner is ORDERED to respond to this Order on or before May 5, 2017, explaining why this action should not be dismissed in accordance with Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Court for lack of jurisdiction. Respondent shall file a response within twenty (20) days of the date Petitioner files his supplemental brief. Petitioner may file a reply within twenty (20) days of the date the response is filed. Refer to Order for further details. (es)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 29, 2017

Filing 21 JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna: Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge 20 , IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mt)

April 5, 2017

Filing 12 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REQUIRING FURTHER BRIEFING by Magistrate Judge John D. Early. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS further briefing regarding whether the Court has jurisdiction to entertain this Petition. Petitioner is ORDERED to respond to this Order on or before May 5, 2017, explaining why this action should not be dismissed in accordance with Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Court for lack of jurisdiction. Respondent shall file a response within twenty (20) days of the date Petitioner files his supplemental brief. Petitioner may file a reply within twenty (20) days of the date the response is filed. *Refer to Order for further details.* (es)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robert Miranda Gomez v. J. Gastelo
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: J. Gastelo
Represented By:	Charles Chung
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Robert Miranda Gomez
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?