Michael Richardson v. County of Los Angeles et al
Michael Richardson |
County of Los Angeles and Renovate America, Inc. |
2:2016cv08943 |
December 2, 2016 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andre Birotte |
Kenly Kiya Kato |
Truth in Lending |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 55 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO DISMISS, AND REMANDING CASES by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Before the Court are Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendants Renovate America ("Renovate"), and the three local government defenda nts Western Riverside Council of Governments, San Bernardino Associated Governments, and the County of Los Angeles ("Governments"). The Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED as to all of Plaintiffs' claims under TILA and HOEPA. These claims a re DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Because the TILA and HOEPA claims are the only claims pled against Western Riverside Council of Governments, San Bernardino Associated Governments, and the County of Los Angeles, these parties are TERMINATED from their re spective cases. The motions are otherwise DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court declines to exercise its supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining claims, so the case is REMANDED back to state court. Each of the three member cases of this consolidated action are to be remanded back to the state court from which it was removed; remanding case to Los Angeles Superior Court, Case Number BC639230. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6 ) (gk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.