Lorcan T. Kilroy v. Los Angeles Unified School District Board of Education et al
| Lorcan Kilroy |
| Justo Avila, Does, Los Angeles Unified School District Board of Education, George McKenna, John Plevac, Monica Ratliff, Ref Rodriguez, Scott Schmerelson and Michel Vezina |
| 2:2016cv09068 |
| December 7, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M. Gee |
| Frederick F. Mumm |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
241
JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 240 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED as follows: 1. Plaintiff Lorcan T. Kilroy ("Plaintiff") shall take nothing by his First Amended Complaint. 2. This action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety (see document for further details). (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr)
|
Filing
84
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge John D. Early, re Stipulation for Protective Order 83 . (see document for details). (dro)
|
Filing
82
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Dolly M. Gee for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 60 . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, the Motion to D ismiss filed by defendants Los Angeles Unified School District Board of Education ("LAUSD"), John Plevack, Paula Greene, Justo Avila, George McKenna, Scott Schmerelson, Monica Ratliff, and Ref Rodriguez ("Motion to Dismiss"), the Opposition of Plaintiff Lorcan T. Kilroy, the Reply of the moving defendants, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the assigned United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted, with some modifications noted below. See document for further information. (dv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.