Mechanix Wear, Inc. et al v. Performance Fabrics, Inc. et al
| Zachary Jergan and Mechanix Wear, Inc. |
| DOES and Performance Fabrics, Inc. |
| 2:2016cv09152 |
| December 9, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Suzanne H. Segal |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Contract: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. On November 16, 2016, Plaintiffs Mechanix Wear Inc. and Zachary Jergan filed a complaint in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles against Defendant Performance Fabrics Inc. seeking declaratory relief. (Compl. 1627, ECF No. [1-1].) Defendant removed the case to federal court on December 9, 2016. (ECF No. 1 .) On January 31, 2017, the Court granted Defendant's motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens. (ECF No. 36 .) It is therefo re ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: 1. Plaintiffs shall recover nothing from Defendant, and their claims againstDefendant are dismissed on the merits and with prejudice; and 2. Defendant shall recover costs from Plaintiffs as evidenced by a bill of costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. (jy)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND 19 AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FORUM NON CONVENIENS 15 , 22 . THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THE CASE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (MD JS-6. Case Terminated).(lc) Modified on 1/31/2017. (lc).
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS EX PARTE APPLICATION 28 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiffs reply is now due on Wednesday, January 24, 2017. The hearing scheduled on the pending motion for forum non conveniens 15 shall be rescheduled to February 6, 2017, at 1:30 p.m. in accord with the parties stipulation. (lc). Modified on 1/19/2017 .(lc).
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER CONVERTING FRCP 12(b)(3) MOTION TO DISMISS 15 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court finds that a Rule 12(b)(3) motion is not proper under the circumstances and will instead treat the motion as one for forum non conveniens.In the interest of fairness, the Court will allow the parties to each file a brief of no more than six pages addressing issues specific to forum non conveniens by January 17, 2017. (lc). Modified on 1/10/2017 .(lc).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
