Terrance Bell v. W. L. Montgomery

Terrance Bell v. W. L. Montgomery

Petitioner:	Terrance Bell
Respondent:	W. L. Montgomery
Case Number:	2:2016cv09212
Filed:	December 13, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	John A. Kronstadt
Presiding Judge:	Alexander F. MacKinnon
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 23, 2017	Filing 16 JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Petition is denied and the action is dismissed without prejudice. Re Order Accepting Report and Recommendations 15 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ib)
May 26, 2017	Filing 12 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. More than twenty-one days have elapsed since the service of the Order on petitioner. As of this date, petitioner has not filed a status report or otherwise communicated with the Cour t. Accordingly, petitioner is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order why the Court should not dismiss his Petition without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Petitioner may discharge this Order by filing, within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, a status report as required by the Court in its order issued on April 18, 2017. (See document for further details.) (sbou)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 23, 2017

Filing 16 JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Petition is denied and the action is dismissed without prejudice. Re Order Accepting Report and Recommendations 15 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ib)

May 26, 2017

Filing 12 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. More than twenty-one days have elapsed since the service of the Order on petitioner. As of this date, petitioner has not filed a status report or otherwise communicated with the Cour t. Accordingly, petitioner is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order why the Court should not dismiss his Petition without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Petitioner may discharge this Order by filing, within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, a status report as required by the Court in its order issued on April 18, 2017. (See document for further details.) (sbou)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Terrance Bell v. W. L. Montgomery
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Terrance Bell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: W. L. Montgomery
Represented By:	Kenneth C Byrne
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?