Serafin Mendez v. Selene Finance LP et al
| Serafin Mendez |
| Does, Selene Finance LP and The Wolf Firm |
| 2:2016cv09335 |
| December 19, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Frederick F. Mumm |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Real Property: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: 1. Plaintiff Serafin Mendez shall recover nothing from Defendants; and 2. Plaintiff Serafin Mendez Second Amended Complaint is dismissed on the merits and with prejudice. JS-6. (jp)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER GRANTING Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 50 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II that the Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 50) and DISMISSES this action in its entirety. The Court will issue a judgment. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND 27 AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS 23 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint. (ECF No. 27.) The Cour t also GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants' motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 23) Plaintiff's claim for negligence survives, while Plaintiff's claims for declaratory relief and violation of the UCL are dismissed without leave to amend. (bp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
