Bank of America, N.A. v. Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service et al
Plaintiff: Bank of America, N.A.
Defendant: Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service, Does, David Quandt, Joan Woodlock and Robert Woodlock
Case Number: 2:2016cv09361
Filed: December 19, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Manuel L. Real
Presiding Judge: Karen L. Stevenson
Nature of Suit: Taxes

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER RE JUDGMENT by Judge Manuel L. Real. JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to the stipulation as follows: 1. The deed of trust in favor of Bank of America (BOA) in the amount of $580,992.00, recorded on October 26, 2009, in the Los Angel es County Recorder's Office as Instrument No 20091612270 (2009 BOA DOT) is in first priority position against thE property, commonly known as 4040 Trinidad Road, Woodland Hills, California 91364 and designated as Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) 2172-028-030 (the Subject Property). 2. The Notice of Federal Tax Lien recorded on or about May 21, 2009, for a tax assessment totaling $35,165.39 as of that date, and which indicated the name of the taxpayer as Robert Woodlock, recorded on May 21, 2009, in the Los Angeles County Recorder's Office as Instrument No. 20090753104 is subordinate to the 2009 BOA DOT 3. All costs and expenses incurred in this action shall be borne by each respective Party. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bank of America, N.A. v. Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bank of America, N.A.
Represented By: Mathias D Maciejewski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service
Represented By: Valerie L Makarewicz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Quandt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joan Woodlock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Woodlock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?