Kacey Janeen Waxler v. John Kerry
Plaintiff: Kacey Janeen Waxler
Defendant: John Kerry
Case Number: 2:2016cv09375
Filed: December 19, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John A. Kronstadt
Presiding Judge: Gail J. Standish
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 31 JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. In light of the August 11, 2017, Order (Dkt. 29) that granted the motion to dismiss this action, the Court hereby ORDERS that judgment be entered in favor of DEFENDANT REX TILLERSON. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (bp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kacey Janeen Waxler v. John Kerry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Kerry
Represented By: OIL-DCS Trial Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kacey Janeen Waxler
Represented By: David M Sturman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?