Robert McCarthy v. Clifford Douglas et al
| Robert McCarthy |
| Does, Clifford Douglas and Elaine Douglas |
| 2:2016cv09496 |
| December 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Andrew J. Wistrich |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF THE ENTIRE CASE WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Pursuant to the Joint Stipulation For Dismissal With Prejudice on file hereinby the parties 36 and for Good Cause shown: All Defendants are dismissed with prejudice from Plaintiff's Complaint. Additionally, Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party shall bear their own respective attorney fees and costs. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)
|
|
Filing
17
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before May 3, 2017, why this action sh ould not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. Defendants Clifford Douglas and Elaine Douglas did not properly answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff(s) have failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. SEE ATTACHED ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAIL. (clee)
|
|
Filing
10
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing on or before April 5, 2017, why this action should not be dismissed f or lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. (iv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
