Linda Moravec Varga v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
| Linda Moravec Varga |
| Does and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
| 2:2016cv09650 |
| December 30, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M. Gee |
| Karen L. Stevenson |
| Contract: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Judgment is entered against Plaintiff Linda Moravec Varga and in favor of Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (yl)
|
|
Filing
31
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND 12 , DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DROP DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO & CO. 15 , AND DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM 16 by Judge Dolly M. Gee: In light of th e foregoing, the Court issues the following rulings: 1. The Court GRANTS Defendants' MTS and STRIKES the FAC's claims against WF & Co.; 2. The Court DENIES Plaintiffs' MTR; 3. The Court DENIES Defendants' Request for Judicial No tice as MOOT; 4. The Court GRANTS Defendants' MTD as to all claims, with leave to amend; 5. By no later than 21 days from the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint or notify Defendants that she does not intend to amend; and 6. Defendants shall file their response within 21 days from the date of service of an amended complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See order for details.) (kti)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
