Andres Gomez v. H.P. Palomino, Inc.
| Andres Gomez |
| H.P. Palomino, Inc., DOES 1 through 10 and H.P. Palomino, Inc. doing business as Palomino Market |
| 2:2017cv00222 |
| January 10, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Terry J Hatter |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Andres Gomez. Dismissal is With Prejudice. (Au, Roland) |
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr: On August 2, 2017, the Court issued an order giving the parties time to file their dismissal order by August 20, 2017, in light of the parties settlement. As of today no dismissal order has been filed. It is therefore ordered that this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. This Court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. [JS-6]IT IS SO ORDERED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.), (yl)
|
|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER AND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES by Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr. In light of the notice of settlement, filed July 13, 2017, indicating that the case has settled in its entirety, this Court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. By August 20, 2017 the parties shall file either a proper stipulation and order for dismissal or judgment. Failure to timely file a stipulation and order for dismissal or judgment shall result in the dismissal of this action. All pending hearings and motions are now taken off calendar and vacated. (smo)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Andres Gomez. (Au, Roland) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE IN CHAMBERS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr: The court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before JULY 14, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this Order To Show Cause, on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: An answer by the defendant(s): In cases removed from State Court, responsive pleadings filed by all defendants; Plaintiff's application for entry of default pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Plaintiff's request that the clerk enter default judgment or plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment pursuant to Rule 55b of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. See order for further details. (shb)
|
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Andres Gomez, upon Defendant H.P. Palomino, Inc. served on 2/27/2017, answer due 3/20/2017. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Rafig Shah, Agent for service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Au, Roland) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant H.P. Palomino, Inc. dba Palomino Market. (shb) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) -NEW CASE BEFORE JUDGE HATTER: This action has been assigned to the calendar of the HONORABLE TERRY J. HATTER, JR., United States District Judge. Please include the initials TJH in all documents pertaining to this case, as documents are routed using the judges initials, it is imperative that the correct initials TJH be used on all subsequent filings to prevent any delays in the processing of documents. Judge Hatter's Courtroom Deputy Clerk is Yolanda Skipper. She can be reached at (213) 894-5276. Counsel shall not attempt to contact the Court or its chambers staff by any other ex parte means, although counsel may contact the Courtroom Deputy, Yolanda Skipper, at: yolanda_skipper@cacd.uscourts.gov, with appropriate inquiries. Judge Hatters courtroom is located on the 9th Floor, at 350 W. 1st Street, United States Courthouse, Courtroom No. 9B. Additional information about Judge Hatters procedures and schedules can be found on the courts website at www.cacd.uscourts.gov. Counsel for Plaintiff shall immediately serve the complaint in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 on all parties, including this Order on any new parties to the action and file the proofs of service pursuant to Local Rule 5-3.1 with the Court. (See order for further details). (shb) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff ANDRES GOMEZ, (Au, Roland) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff ANDRES GOMEZ. (Au, Roland) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff ANDRES GOMEZ. (Au, Roland) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-19174389 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff ANDRES GOMEZ. (Attorney Roland Au added to party ANDRES GOMEZ(pty:pla))(Au, Roland) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
