Kandace Borquez v. Equinox Holdings, Inc. et al
| Kandace Borquez |
| Does and Equinox Holdings, Inc. |
| 2:2017cv00266 |
| January 12, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Frederick F. Mumm |
| John F. Walter |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER DISMISSING ACTION by Judge John F. Walter: In light of the Notice of Settlement filed 9/8/2017, Docket No. 83 , and inabsence of timely Motion For Approval of Settlement, the Court dismisses this action. The Clerk is ordered to close this case. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. The parties are ordered to show cause in writing by June 23, 2017 why the Court should not impose sanctions in the amo unt of $1,500.00 against lead counsel for each of the parties for their violation of the Courts CMO. No oral argument on this matter will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause will result in the imposition of sanctions and dismissal of this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. (jloz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
