Matt Salnick v. Ameron Pole Products, LLC

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Matt Salnick v. Ameron Pole Products, LLC

Matt Salnick v. Ameron Pole Products, LLC

Plaintiff:	Matt Salnick
Defendant:	Ameron Pole Products, LLC
Case Number:	2:2017cv00359
Filed:	January 17, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Jacqueline Chooljian
Presiding Judge:	Consuelo B. Marshall
Nature of Suit:	Environmental Matters

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 14, 2019	Filing 56 CONSENT JUDGMENT by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: The storm water pollution control measures required by this Consent Decree shall designed and operated to manage storm water discharges, through full compliance with the IGP. Ameron will appoint a Q ualified Industrial Storm Water Practitioner ("QISP") within sixth(60) days after the Effective Date; Within forty-five (45) days after the Effective Date, Ameron shall revise the SWPPP for the Ameron Facility to include any BMPs required b y the Consent Decree and comply with all provision of the Permit. Ameron shall submit its SWPPP, including any revisions, to Plaintiff for review comment. Plaintiff shall provide comments, if any, to Ameron within sixty (60) days of receipt of SWPPP . Ameron shall incorporate Plaintiff's comments into the SWPPP, or shall justify in writing why any comment is not incorporated within fifteen (15) days of receiving comments. Within ninety (90) days of the Effective Date, Ameron shall review it s plan for monitoring all storm water discharges from the Ameron Facility that meet the requirements of this Consent Decree and Section XI of the Permit, and incorporate the same into its SWPPP. Ameron shall make a one-time payment of Fifteen Thousan d Dollars ($15,000.00) to compensate Plaintiff's Counsel for costs and fees to be incurred for monitoring Ameron's compliance with this Consent Decree. To remediate the alleged environmental harms resulting from non compliance with the 1997 Storm Water Permit and IGP alleged in the Complaint, Ameron agrees to make a payment of Eight Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($8,500.00) to "The Nature Conservancy. Ameron shall pay a total of Fifty-One Thousand Five Hundred Dollars (& #036;51,500.00) to Brodsky & Smith, LLC for their investigation fees and co expert-consultant fees and costs, and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred as a result of investigating, preparing the lawsuit and negotiating this Consent Decree. This Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter. Related to: Order, 55 . See order for further details. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (shb)<Attachments>(shb)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 14, 2019

Filing 56 CONSENT JUDGMENT by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: The storm water pollution control measures required by this Consent Decree shall designed and operated to manage storm water discharges, through full compliance with the IGP. Ameron will appoint a Q ualified Industrial Storm Water Practitioner ("QISP") within sixth(60) days after the Effective Date; Within forty-five (45) days after the Effective Date, Ameron shall revise the SWPPP for the Ameron Facility to include any BMPs required b y the Consent Decree and comply with all provision of the Permit. Ameron shall submit its SWPPP, including any revisions, to Plaintiff for review comment. Plaintiff shall provide comments, if any, to Ameron within sixty (60) days of receipt of SWPPP . Ameron shall incorporate Plaintiff's comments into the SWPPP, or shall justify in writing why any comment is not incorporated within fifteen (15) days of receiving comments. Within ninety (90) days of the Effective Date, Ameron shall review it s plan for monitoring all storm water discharges from the Ameron Facility that meet the requirements of this Consent Decree and Section XI of the Permit, and incorporate the same into its SWPPP. Ameron shall make a one-time payment of Fifteen Thousan d Dollars ($15,000.00) to compensate Plaintiff's Counsel for costs and fees to be incurred for monitoring Ameron's compliance with this Consent Decree. To remediate the alleged environmental harms resulting from non compliance with the 1997 Storm Water Permit and IGP alleged in the Complaint, Ameron agrees to make a payment of Eight Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($8,500.00) to "The Nature Conservancy. Ameron shall pay a total of Fifty-One Thousand Five Hundred Dollars (& #036;51,500.00) to Brodsky & Smith, LLC for their investigation fees and co expert-consultant fees and costs, and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred as a result of investigating, preparing the lawsuit and negotiating this Consent Decree. This Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter. Related to: Order, 55 . See order for further details. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (shb)<Attachments>(shb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Matt Salnick v. Ameron Pole Products, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Ameron Pole Products, LLC
Represented By:	Tarifa Belle Laddon
Represented By:	Amanda Semaan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matt Salnick
Represented By:	Ryan P Cardona
Represented By:	Evan Jason Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?