John Hakim v. ADESA California LLC et al
Plaintiff: John Hakim
Defendant: ADESA California LLC, Does 1 through 20, inclusive and ADESA California LLC doing business as Adesa Los Angeles
Case Number: 2:2017cv00401
Filed: January 18, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 19, 2017 Filing 4 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Stephen V. Wilson for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to David T. Bristow. New Case Number 5:17-cv-00090. (jtil)
January 18, 2017 CONFORMED ANSWER TO First Amended Complaint filed by Defendant ADESA California LLC in Riverside Superior Court on 1/17/2017.(jtil)
January 18, 2017 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff John Hakim in Riverside Superior Court on 11/23/2016, and attached to Notice of Removal as Exhibit C.(jtil)
January 18, 2017 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff John Hakim in Riverside Superior Court on 8/2/2016, and attached to Notice of Removal #1 as Exhibit A. (jtil)
January 18, 2017 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant ADESA California LLC, identifying John Hakim, ADESA California, LLC dba ADESA Los Angeles, ADESA, Inc., Zurich American Insurance. (Pearson, Matthew)
January 18, 2017 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant ADESA California LLC. (Pearson, Matthew)
January 18, 2017 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside Superior Court, case number RIC 1609869 Receipt No: 0973-19210406 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant ADESA California LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Paul J. Lips ISO Notice of Removal, #2 Declaration of Matthew D. Pearson ISO Notice of Removal) (Attorney Matthew D Pearson added to party ADESA California LLC(pty:dft))(Pearson, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: John Hakim v. ADESA California LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Hakim
Represented By: Zef Mihilli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ADESA California LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ADESA California LLC doing business as Adesa Los Angeles
Represented By: Ryan David Fischbach
Represented By: Matthew D Pearson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?