Ahmad Ammar v. Los Angeles City College

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Ahmad Ammar v. Los Angeles City College

Ahmad Ammar v. Los Angeles City College

Plaintiff:	Ahmad Ammar
Defendant:	Los Angeles City College
Case Number:	2:2017cv00456
Filed:	January 19, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Andre Birotte
Presiding Judge:	Alicia G. Rosenberg
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 20, 2017	Filing 10 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before April 27, 2017, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show cause will stand submitted upon t he filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. Absent showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are n ot served on a Defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Plaintiff(s) have failed to file a proof of service within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint on the following Defendant(s): Los Angeles City College Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by showing that service was effectuated within the 90 day deadline or by showing good cause for failure to do so. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). IT IS SO ORDERED. SEE ATTACHED ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAIL. (clee)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 20, 2017

Filing 10 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before April 27, 2017, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show cause will stand submitted upon t he filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. Absent showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are n ot served on a Defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Plaintiff(s) have failed to file a proof of service within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint on the following Defendant(s): Los Angeles City College Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by showing that service was effectuated within the 90 day deadline or by showing good cause for failure to do so. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). IT IS SO ORDERED. SEE ATTACHED ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAIL. (clee)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ahmad Ammar v. Los Angeles City College
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ahmad Ammar
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Los Angeles City College
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?