Bruce Rorty v. Premier Baths, Inc. et al
| Bruce Rorty |
| Broker Match, Inc., Does, Global Equity Finance, Inc., Home Point Financial Corporation, Loandepot.com LLC, Premier Baths, Inc. and Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. |
| 2:2017cv00505 |
| January 20, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Steve Kim |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. THE COURT having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled 67 ; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudi ce to the right, upon good cause shown within 45 days, to reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. This Court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)
|
|
Filing
62
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before September 21, 2017, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. (iv)
|
|
Filing
56
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed, for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S . 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before August 16, 2017, why this action should not be dismissed for lac k of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) respo nse. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. Plaintiff(s) obtained entry of default as to Defendant(s) Broker Match, Inc., pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a), but Plaintiff(s) have not so ught default judgment, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking default judgment or by notifying the Court that default judgment will not be sought, at which point the clerk will close this matter. IT IS SO ORDERED. (clee)
|
|
Filing
30
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before May 2, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. (iv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
