Marion Marc Pryor v. Los Angeles County District Attorneys Office

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Marion Marc Pryor v. Los Angeles County District Attorneys Office

Marion Marc Pryor v. Los Angeles County District Attorneys Office

Plaintiff:	Marion Marc Pryor
Defendant:	Los Angeles County District Attonreys Office
Case Number:	2:2017cv00633
Filed:	January 26, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Dale S. Fischer
Presiding Judge:	Alicia G. Rosenberg
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Civil Rights

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 7, 2017	Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. On January 26, 2017, Plaintiff, a state inmate, filed a civil rights complaint and requested leave to proceed without prepayment of filing fees. For the reasons discussed below, it appears the court lacks jurisdiction over Plaintiff's claims under either the Rooker-Feldman doctrine or the Younger doctrine. The court therefore orders Plaintiff to show cause on or before March 6, 2017, why this court should not recommend dismissal without prejudice due to lack of jurisdiction. If Plaintiff fails to respond to this order to show cause by March 6, 2017, then the court may recommend dismissal of this action for lack of jurisdiction. (See Order for details.) (mp)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 7, 2017

Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. On January 26, 2017, Plaintiff, a state inmate, filed a civil rights complaint and requested leave to proceed without prepayment of filing fees. For the reasons discussed below, it appears the court lacks jurisdiction over Plaintiff's claims under either the Rooker-Feldman doctrine or the Younger doctrine. The court therefore orders Plaintiff to show cause on or before March 6, 2017, why this court should not recommend dismissal without prejudice due to lack of jurisdiction. If Plaintiff fails to respond to this order to show cause by March 6, 2017, then the court may recommend dismissal of this action for lack of jurisdiction. (See Order for details.) (mp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marion Marc Pryor v. Los Angeles County District Attorneys Office
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Los Angeles County District Attonreys Office
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marion Marc Pryor
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?