Daniel Cohen v. Sandra Alfaro et al
| Daniel Cohen |
| Sandra Alfaro, Doe 1 through Doe 31, Muhammad Farooq, S. Josh Manavi, Aldukwe N. Odeluga, Tim Perez and Bahua Yang |
| 2:2017cv00684 |
| January 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A. Kronstadt |
| Alicia G. Rosenberg |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Yang is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Perez and Farooq are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the stipulation of the parties. (Dkt. No. 25 .) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (See Order for Further Details) (kl)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT YANG NOT BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE INFORMATION NECESSARY FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause in writing, on or bef ore September 25, 2017, why Yang should not be dismissed from this action without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m). Plaintiff should provide any additional information he has about Yang so that Yang can be served with process. (See Order for details.) (mp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
