Walter Sanchez v. Carolyn Samuelson et al
| Walter Sanchez |
| Does, Gloria Leonor Hakopian and Carolyn Samuelson |
| 2:2017cv00756 |
| January 31, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| John A. Kronstadt |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Application 28 is GRANTED IN PARTand judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants Carolyn Samuelson and Gloria Lenor Hakopian in the amount of $8,156.45. This amount is the sum of th e remaining $7000 principal amount due under the settlement agreement, prejudgment interest of $156.45, and liquidated damages of $1000. Prejudgment interest has been calculated as follows: (i) principal amount of $7,000; (ii) for 412 days requested by Plaintiff; and (iii) at a rate equal to that identified pursuant to 28 USC 1961 as of 7/20/2019. Insufficient good cause has been shown for either a 10 percent rate for prejudgment interest or liquidated damages greater than $1000 as an offset to the fees and costs Plaintiff incurred in pursuing the relief granted through this judgment. (jp)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. Dkt. 25 (ake)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
