Alreda Gleicher v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company, et al
Alfreda Gleicher |
Christian Julian Alexander, Car Owner Doe Number One, Audrey Angela Cavenccia, Does and Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company |
2:2017cv00773 |
January 31, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Fernando M. Olguin |
Gail J. Standish |
Insurance |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 MINUTE (In Chambers) Order Remanding Action by Judge Fernando M. Olguin: IT IS ORDERED that:(1) Plaintiff Motion to Remand (Document No. 11 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Motion is granted to the extent it seeks remand of the action to state court. The Motion is denied to the extent plaintiff seeks fees and costs. (2) All pending motions and defaults are vacated. Defendants may re-file vacated motions in the state court pursuant to state-court procedures. (3) The above-captioned a ction shall be remanded to the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, 111 North Hill St., Los Angeles, CA 90012, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 USC 1447(c). (4) The Clerk shall send a certified copy of this Order to the state court. (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (jp) |
Filing 26 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL RE: LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 4/7/2017. (vdr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.