Maurice Lallemand v. County of Los Angeles et al
| Maurice Lallemand |
| Allen Castellano, County of Los Angeles, DOES, Ungrey Holifield, Jim McDonnell, Tawnia Rojas, Ernesto Valencia and Matthew Vanderhorck |
| 2:2017cv00781 |
| January 31, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A. Kronstadt |
| Suzanne H. Segal |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
248
ORDER RE DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 247 by Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr: The Court makes the following Order: 1. Order that this action is dismissed without prejudice; 2. Retain jurisdiction to vacate the dismissal order and reopen this action within 180 days from the Notice of Settlement, unless, the parties request that the Court retain jurisdiction for an additional period of time necessary to finalize the settlement; 3. The parties shall file a dismissal, with prejudice, upon the settlement being finalized; 4. If no dismissal with prejudice is filed at the end of the initial 180 day period, or extended period, the parties shall appear for a status conference. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)
|
|
Filing
90
PROTECTIVE ORDER RE MATERIALS PRODUCED PURSUANT TO THE COURT'S JANUARY 12, 2018 ORDER (ECF 88 ) by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal re Stipulation for Protective Order, 89 . See document for details. (mr)
|
|
Filing
68
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal, re: Stipulation for Protective Order, 67 . (mz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
