Securities and Exchange Commission v. Thomas Miller et al
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: William Liang and Thomas Miller
Case Number: 2:2017cv00897
Filed: February 3, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Consuelo B. Marshall
Presiding Judge: Rozella A. Oliver
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 206 FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT WILLIAM LIANG by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. Section 78m(b )(5) and Exchange Act Rule 13b2-1 thereunder, 17 C.F.R. Section 240.13b2-1. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant shall pay a civil penalty in the amount of $35,000 to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Sect ion 21(d)(3) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. Section 78u(d). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. See order for details. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (shb)
February 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 197 FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT THOMAS MILLER ONLY 192 by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by certifying a periodic report containing false statements filed by an issuer in accordance with Exchange Act Section 13(a). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant shall pay a civil penalty in the amount of $55,000 to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 21(d)(3) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. Section 78u(d). Defendant shall make this payment within 14 days after entry of this Final Judgment. Defendant shall pay post-judgment interest on any delinquent amounts. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. See order for further details. (shb)
April 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 55 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver re Stipulation for Protective Order 53 . (see order for details) (hr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Thomas Miller et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Liang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Represented By: Jason P Lee
Represented By: Gary Y Leung
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?