Michael Kors, L.L.C. v. M R Enterprises et al
| Michael Kors, LLC |
| Annie Collection, Inc., DOES, Chulsoo Kyoung, Jin Hyun Kyoung, M R Enterprises and Deepak Narula |
| 2:2017cv01052 |
| February 9, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Manuel L. Real |
| Alka Sagar |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Manuel L. Real: THE COURT having been advised by the counsel for the parties that the action has been settled 63 ; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the ri ght, upon good cause shown within 30 days, to reopen the action if the settlement is not consummated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all dates set in this action are hereby vacated. The Court reserves its jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing the settlement. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANTS ANSWER SHOULD NOT BE STRICKEN by Judge Manuel L. Real. On 5/26/2017, Defendant Deepak Narula filed Answers to the First Amended Complaint on behalf of M R Enterprises. According to Local Rule 83-2.2.2., "only individuals may represent themselves pro se." IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that each party show cause as to why Defendant's Answer should not be stricken in violation of Local Rule 83-2.2.2, on or before 7/28/2017. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
