Neftali Monzon et al v. City of Murrieta et al
Marylou Monzon, Neftali Monzon and Jerrico Reyes |
Zack Bradley, City of Murrieta, DOES, Kyle Mikowski, Scott Montez, Blake Williams and Chris Zeltner |
2:2017cv01371 |
February 20, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Steve Kim |
Otis D. Wright |
Civil Rights: Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 114 JUDGMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner. JUDGMENT is entered in favor of defendants City of Murrieta, a government entity, Scott Montez, individually, Chris Zeltner, individually, Kyle Mikowski, individually, Zach Bradley, individually, and Blake William s,individually and against plaintiffs Neftali Monzon as Personal Representative of the Estate of Junef Ragadio Monzon and individually, Marylou Monzon, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Junef Ragadio Monzon and individually,Jerrico Reyes, i ndividually. The motion for judgment on the pleadings of defendants City of Murrieta, a government entity; Scott Monte, individually, Chris Zeltner, individually, Kyle Mikowski, individually, Zach Bradley, individually, and Blake Williams,individually and against Jerrico Reyes, individually, is denied as moot.The moving defendants shall recover their reasonable costs of suit herein as against plaintiffs. (bp) |
Filing 25 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT 20 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc). Modified on 8/18/2017 (lc). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.