Roseanne Hansen et al v. Scram of California, Inc.
| Roseanne Hansen and Jennifer Oh |
| Alcohol Monitoring Systems, Inc., Does and Scram of California, Inc. |
| 2:2017cv01474 |
| February 23, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| Christina A. Snyder |
| Tort Product Liability |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
(IN CHAMBERS) - PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE by Judge Christina A. Snyder. The Court is in receipt of plaintiffs' Notice of Dismissal 66 filed September 24, 2017. No Prop osed Order was submitted. The Court hereby grants plaintiffs' request to dismiss the above-entitled action, without prejudice. Each party to bear their own costs and fees. All dates are hereby vacated and the action is hereby ordered closed. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)
|
|
Filing
19
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court GRANTS defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiffs' claims 10 . Plaintiffs' claims are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff shall have 21 days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint addressing the deficiencies identified herein. Failure to do so may result in dismissal with prejudice. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
