Rexina Mize et al v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
| Rexina Mize and Minh Nguyen |
| Does, Ethicon, Inc., Johnson and Johnson and Mentor Worldwide LLC |
| 2:2017cv01747 |
| March 3, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M. Gee |
| Karen L. Stevenson |
| Personal Injury: Health Care |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO STATE COURT by Judge Dolly M. Gee: On 8/17/2017, Plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint 51 . Pursuant to the 8/17/2017 Court Order 50 , the action is hereby REMANDED this action to the Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case Number BC649083. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6 ) Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
|
Filing
24
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS)ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT 18 AND VACATING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND 17 by Judge Dolly M. Gee: # 23.] Defendants Motion to Dismiss [Doc. # 18] is DENIED without prejudice as moot. The May 19, 20 17 hearing is VACATED. Defendants shall file their response within 21 days from the filing of the First Amended Complaint. Further, pursuant to the Plaintiffs notice of withdrawing motion to remand (Motion) [Doc. # 22], the Motion [Doc. # 17] is withdrawn, and the May 19, 2017 hearing is VACATED.IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
