Francois Tabi v. McCullough et al
| Francois Tabi |
| J. Atkinson, Enriquez, Four unnamed Defendants, Kenneth Heinsuis, T. Mayer and McCullough |
| 2:2017cv01795 |
| March 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Dolly M. Gee |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee. IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. Related to: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 45 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (et)
|
|
Filing
26
JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee. In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order Dismissing Action, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. Within seven (7) days of the date of this Order, plaintiff shall show cause, if there be any, why proper service was not made on defendants by October 13, 2017 and why this case should n ot be dismissed without prejudice against the defendants for failure to effectuate service and for lack of prosecution. Failure timely to respond to this Order to Show Cause or to show cause, may result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice for failure to effectuate service and/or for lack of prosecution. See order for further details. (hr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
