Travis Robinson v. Debbie Asuncion
Petitioner: Travis Robinson
Respondent: Debbie Asuncion
Case Number: 2:2017cv01810
Filed: March 7, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Rozella A. Oliver
Presiding Judge: Josephine L. Staton
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 42 JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Pursuant to the Court's Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed with prejudice. Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 41 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Travis Robinson v. Debbie Asuncion
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Debbie Asuncion
Represented By: Jonathan Matthew Krauss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Travis Robinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?