Emanon Thease Carr v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Emanon Tnease Carr
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 2:2017cv02040
Filed: March 14, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David O. Carter
Presiding Judge: Charles F. Eick
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani Re Stipulation 24 : The above captioned matter is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees, costs, and expenses. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (ad)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Emanon Thease Carr v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Emanon Tnease Carr
Represented By: Cyrus Safa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?