Jose Amador Jacobo v. Mun Kim et al
Jose Amador Jacobo |
Does and Mun Kim |
2:2017cv02374 |
March 27, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Manuel L. Real |
Karen L. Stevenson |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER OF DISMISSAL BY LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Manuel L. Real. Plaintiff was ordered to show cause in writing by not later than October 11, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution 20 ; WHEREAS, this period has elapsed without any action by plaintiff. The Court hereby DISMISSES this instant action for lack of prosecution. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv) |
Filing 20 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Manuel L. Real. Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing no later than October 11, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. In accor dance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral argument on this Order to Show Cause will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action. (iv) |
Filing 16 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Manuel L. Real. Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing no later than August 11, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. In accor dance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral argument on this Order to Show Cause will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Court's Order will result in the dismissal of the action. (iv) |
Filing 11 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Manuel L. Real. Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing no later than July 13, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider the filing of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: Proof of Service of summons and complaint In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7- 15, no oral argument on this Order to Show Cause will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Court's Order will result in the dismissal of the action. (clee) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.