Manuel Marquez v. United Parcel Service Co., et al
| Manuel Marquez |
| Does, Diego Garcia, United Parcel Service Co., United Parcel Service Inc. and United Parcel Services General Services Co. |
| 2:2017cv02468 |
| March 30, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W. Fitzgerald |
| Alka Sagar |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
MINUTES (In Chambers): ORDER Re Plaintiff's Motion to Remand 11 ; Defendant United parcel Service Inc's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 15 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: The Motion to Remand is GRANTED. Because the Court lacks jurisdiction over the case, the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is DENIED as moot. Accordingly, the Court REMANDS the action to the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
|
Filing
23
MINUTES OF Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court 11 ; Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 15 before Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: The Courtroom Deputy Clerk distributes the Court's tentative ruling prior to the case being called. Case called, and counsel make their appearance. The Court hears oral argument from counsel and takes the matter under submission. An order will issue. Court Reporter: Lisa Gonzalez. (jp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
