Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan v. ANEFX, Inc.
Plaintiff: Board Of Directors Of The Motion Picture Industry Health Plan, Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Individual Account Plan and Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan
Defendant: ANEFX, INC.
Case Number: 2:2017cv02621
Filed: April 5, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Chooljian
Presiding Judge: Christina A. Snyder
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 36 MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder: RE PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 34 . The Court GRANTS plaintiffs motion for default judgment. The Court ORDERS that judgment be entered in favor of plaintiffs and defenda nt shall be liable to plaintiffs in the amount of $668,694.03which is comprised of $368,209.80 in unpaid contributions, $42,175.14 in employee shareholder contributions, $91,747.44 in interest, $91,747.44 in liquidated damage s, $29,055.38 in liquidated damages and interest on late-paid contributions, $19,875 in audit fees, $25,022.50 in attorneys fees, and $1,131.33 in costs; plus interest, at the rate of 1% per month, commencing when payment w as due and continuing until payment is made.The Court further ORDERS that defendant shall submit to an audit pursuant to the terms of the Trust Agreements for the period beginning May 1, 2016 to the date judgment is entered by the Court. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (lc) .Modified on 4/3/2018 (lc).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan v. ANEFX, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANEFX, INC.
Represented By: Edward William Burns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Board Of Directors Of The Motion Picture Industry Health Plan
Represented By: Kathryn Jane Halford
Represented By: Elizabeth Rosenfeld
Represented By: Nicholas Isaac Starkman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Individual Account Plan
Represented By: Kathryn Jane Halford
Represented By: Elizabeth Rosenfeld
Represented By: Nicholas Isaac Starkman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan
Represented By: Kathryn Jane Halford
Represented By: Elizabeth Rosenfeld
Represented By: Nicholas Isaac Starkman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?